Motorway Services Online

Retrieved from "https://motorwayservicesonline.co.uk"

Service stations are open with reduced facilities.

Tap for full details.


Rotherham services

Rotherham
Camera icon
No photos tagged with Rotherham. If you have one, why not upload it?
Road:M1 at J33
(also accessible to traffic on the A630)
(Google Maps link)
Address:not provided
Opening:2021
Grid reference:SK430892 (SABRE Maps)
Services type:Single site located at a junction.

Please note that this service area is not yet open.



This is the proposed services on the M1. For the existing site on the A57, see Sheffield Parkway.

Two rival service station plans in South Yorkshire came to a head in 2019, and resulted in planning permission being granted for a new motorway service area on the M1 near Rotherham.

The approved Rotherham plan (promoted as Rotherham & Sheffield Gateway) was put forward by Applegreen. They have since passed all motorway service area proposals to Welcome Break, who already own nearby Woodall. In a statement, Applegreen told us:

Applegreen are pleased to confirm that planning permission was secured [...] for the building of a new Welcome Break site that will be added to the existing network in the UK.


Trivia and History

The Applegreen proposal was one of many they made to try to break into the UK motorway service area market. It was launched in March 2017.

The approved scheme has an unusual layout with the HGV parking and amenities positioned to the north of M1 J33. Customer parking and amenities for other motorway users is located to the south of the M1, connected via the existing road tunnel. 498 car parking spaces would be provided, including 30 disabled, as well as space for 19 motorbikes, 67 lorries, 15 coaches and 18 caravans. 300 jobs would be created.

The unusual design of splitting the services around the junction allowed for the traffic flow to be split across two roads, operating anti-clockwise around the junction. This means there is no need to turn right across the busy A630. It also reduces the impact on the environment by nestling into a tighter space. The down-side is that no matter whether you are heading north or south along the M1, at some point you would need to turn right around a large section of the busy roundabout.

The Applegreen plan had the advantage that it was designed under newer regulations, which were much more relaxed about what a motorway service area could offer. However, Applegreen still had to overcome the issue of access to the site, which had proven to be a stumbling block for many of their proposals.

Extra objected to the Applegreen plan, as did the Sheffield Chamber of Commerce.

In November 2019, the Applegreen Rotherham plan was approved. Rotherham Borough Council were thought to have been won over by the proposed junction improvements, despite some objectors arguing that it would divert investment away from other areas.

Extra Smithy Wood Plan

The approved Applegreen proposal was an effort to overtake a controversial project from Extra.

Extra wanted to build a large service area in the south-west corner of M1 J35, Smithy Wood. Their rekindled enthusiasm for building new services comes following a period of quiet stability, which they needed to recover from the financial uncertainty caused by poor turnover at Derby with Burton and Leicester North and the high investment placed into Beaconsfield and Cobham.

In March 2014, planning permission was granted to Extra by Sheffield City Council. However in November 2014, the plans were put on hold following protests about the 12th century Smithy Wood which would be destroyed by the plans.

Extra maintained that they had studied the area, and that their proposal was the only suitable place where a new motorway service area could be built. This claim was called into question by Applegreen's proposal, made in March 2017. The following September, Extra requested Applegreen's plan be decided upon first, suggesting if Applegreen's plan was approved then Extra would drop theirs.

Under the current regulations, there is no reason why both service areas couldn't be built, but the two operators might not want to be competing with each other. In addition, the planning authorities might not want two motorway service areas to be built, which is made more complicated by the fact the two junctions fall under different jurisdictions.

Applegreen's plan was approved in November 2019. Pressure from the Woodland Trust on Extra rose, and in January 2020 Extra confirmed that they were withdrawing their proposal.

Previous Plans

Hesley services was a joint proposal by Extra (forecourt) and Roadchef (services) in the south-east quadrant of J35 of the M1.

It was rejected because the land was a green belt area, the council felt that insufficient information had been provided and that a new service area wasn't needed.

The Smithy Wood plan was close to the planned site of Chapeltown services, north of J35, which was cancelled in the 1960s.

Alternatives

Previous:Next:
Woodall (14 miles) Services on the M1 Woolley Edge (12 miles)

Visitor Feedback

Our comments section was refreshed in 2019. Until new comments arrive, you may want to check the archive.


Views expressed in these comments are those of the individual contributor. They are moderated by Facebook.
We ask the companies named to check here regularly but can't guarentee they will do so.