Destination in its own right
The phrase "destination in its own right" was used from 1980 until 2013 by the Department of Transport and Highways Agency, to prohibit operators from providing any more than the most basic facilities.
The phrase means that service areas could only provide facilities that would be needed by passing traffic, and nothing that would cause people to head out of their way to visit it. Quite literally, it can't be somebody's destination. This meant no lavish hotels, no large shopping centres and no activity centres. The government feared that elaborate facilities would be overrun by visitors and wouldn't be able to properly cater for passing traffic.
The rule stemmed from an original concern from the Ministry of Transport. The early motorway services were built using land acquired with a Compulsory Purchase Order to provide a vital facility for road users. If it turned out some of the land was being used to provide something that wasn't vital or wasn't for road users, an aggrieved neighbour could argue that the CPO has been abused.
When the government started selling the freehold of service areas in 1992, the rule was written in their service area policy, to ensure service areas continued to prioritise motorway traffic over locals.
The second fear was that a developer might be able to get around planning legislation by pretending to be building a service area, and then changing it to a supermarket.
Although A-road services were never owned by the government, the 'destination in its own right' rule was later applied to them too, as a way of assessing whether a business proposal was appropriate or not.
In 2013 service areas were deregulated, and this was one of many rules to be removed. The government of the time wanted to encourage commercial development next to major roads, and since then "becoming a destination" has been permitted. In the following years service areas have were built as part of business parks or new housing developments, and Extra started actively promoting their service areas to local residents.
While the rule was in place, service areas persistently argued that the rule stopped them providing profitable or popular facilities. Arguably most lodges were being marketed at people staying in the local area, so were acting as a destination in their own right, even though officially they said they were serving people who were already part-way through a journey.
One curious exception was Rheged Discovery Centre, which despite the rule, served as both an official service area and "Cumbria's leading family day out".
In the early days of motorway service areas, they were frequently in trouble for provided unauthorised facilities. Granada were accused of running their services "like resorts", while Corley had a crazy golf course and Newport Pagnell was chastised for over-celebrating its 30th birthday.
One of the last examples of the rule in action was the business case for Gloucester services. As it talked about specialising in high quality, local food, the Highways Agency warned that it may be about to become a destination. In the event by the time it opened the rule had been abolished, and many people have since confessed that they have used the motorway purely to visit Gloucester services.
People often ask why the major supermarket chains never took an interest in service stations. Although the two industries have some overlap, the destination in its own right ruling would have caused the supermarkets to look very different - and that's before you consider the limit on retail floorspace which service areas were ruled by until 2013.